Dave's World

An epic blog about the simple things in life and how we should all love one another...NOT REALLY. This is just random shit.

Monday, January 30, 2006

Its been more than a week...

No, the government did not shut me down after that last post. I have been mega busy completing my application for the School of Education at the University of Pittsburgh, so I have not done much of anything else over the past week. However, the world continues to turn. Here are some of the things that have happened since my last post.

1. I completed my application. Ugh. For better or for worse I have done all the paper work and got the letters of recommendation that I needed (some pretty goods ones, I think). Its a huge weight off my shoulders. One less thing that needs to be done. Now if I could just get that darn novel started.

2. The Pittsburgh Steelers are going to the Super Bowl. The Steelers won the AFC Championship against the Denver Broncos 34-17. Hey, I know that at this point this is old news, but I would probably be kicked out of Pittsburgh if I didn't mention it.

3. The guys at ifanboy.com mentioned me on their January 20th podcast. I have been listening to them comment of comics for a couple of weeks and posted my name on their "Frapper Map". Another one of my 15 minutes of fame used.

4. Tech people announced the threat of a new virus that is targeting Windows machines. The Nyxem virus is threatening to delete Word, Powerpoint, Excel, and Acrobat from infected machines on February 3rd. Good thing I blog on a Mac.

5. Jonathan Kent, Superman's dad, dies (the character not the actor) on Smallville. This show has its ups and downs. Too many of its characters (including Clark) are too two-dimensional. I liked Jonathan, he was like the third well developed character on the show. Last season there wasn'?t much that was done with him, so that sucked. This year they did the election thing, which isn'?t canon for Superman, but it got my curiousity wondering how it would turn out. Now they have gone and made an Uncle Ben out of him. Another thing, Jonathan has been shot and tossed around more than a couple times since he developed a heart condition and suddenly something on a piece of paper that Lionel shows him pushes him over the edge. I have a hard time swallowing that. Ah well.

6. Brian Michael Bendis' run as writer of Daredevil comes to an end with the release of issue #81. Daredevil has never been a very interesting character to me, but the buzz about what Bendis was doing with the comic book made me curious. I can't say that he made a Daredevil fan out of me, but I enjoyed some parts of the four year long arc. Another thing on Bendis, last year he destroyed the "classic" Avengers superhero team and then remixed the title with some old and new characters. When it was announced that Spidey (Marvel's classic loner) and Wolverine (Marvel's most over extended character-- I think he appears in at least six different comics a month) would be on the "New Avengers," I groaned. It seemed like a marketing maneuver. Get Marvel's two most popular characters on a revamped Avengers and the fanboys will lap it up. I didn't want to like it, but Bendis has done a decent job of bringing together the "New Avengers" and he does seem to spin the characters in entertaining ways. Even if it takes the guy an entire year to bring the book together, its been fun, and that is the only thing that matters in comics. Having fun.

7. Scientists, with their Bunsen burners and electrical doo dads, announced that concentrations of greenhouse gases may have a more serious impact on global warming that previously imagined. The Greenland ice sheet may melt and raise sea levels 23ft over the next 1,000 years. I guess we better get off of this mud ball while we can.

8. In the spirit of space exploration and the idea of traveling beyond the planet Earth, January 28th, 1986 the Space Shuttle Challenger exploded after take off. This past Saturday marked 20 years since the disaster. I was five years old at the time, so I don't remember much of the event. Over the weekend I saw some of what then President Ronald Regan had said afterwards. It was something about not allowing the tragedy to hinder man's exploration of space. It takes a lot of resources to send men and women into space. Resources that could be used to clothe the poor, feed the hungry, or offer a shit load of financial aid to college students. What do we get out of going to the Moon or Mars? Velcro and satellite television are two products of the U.S. space program. Has it been worth it? Absolutely. It isn't a financial issue. How many billions of dollars goes into military spending? The exploration of space is the future. Yeah, I say that as a huge sci-fi dork, but at some point, billions or trillions of years from now, the sun is going to implode and when that happens life in our solar system is going to get wiped away. If we don't get off this rock then everything that we ever were from day one, will be gone. Then what?

9. Big Momma's House 2 tops the box office over the weekend. Hey, I think Martin Lawrence can be damn funny. However, what's the worst that can happen? This sequel.

10. Today, I got a compelling/frustrating/interesting email. And thats all that I will say about it. That's cryptic.

Thursday, January 19, 2006

American Terror Attack???

In one of my earlier posts I ranted about Iran and spouted a conspiracy theory that I thought was funny. It was a joke. I was being silly. However, this rant is no joke and it is not my intention to amuse anyone.

Last week an air strike attacked the village of Damadola, in Pakistan. It is being reported that three different houses were destroyed and eighteen people were killed in the attack. It is believed that four of the dead were foreigners to the region, the rest were locals. The remains of the four foreigners were removed from the scene before being identified. It is believed that the target of the attack was Ayman al-Zawahiri, who is believed to be a prominent al-Qaeda leader. The attack was made on private residences. Witnesses claim that the attacks were made by jets and/or unmanned Predator drones. The Predator has been used in Afghanistan by US forces.

Did the US attack the village of Damadola to eliminate al-Qaeda members? Other than eye witness accounts, where villagers say they saw was a Predator drone launching missiles, there is nothing that proves the US carried out the attack. The US has not denied conducting the attack. I seem to remember a story from a few months back that the US traded/sold arms with Pakistan. I do not mean to imply that the US was framed for the attack, but I think it is a good idea to always consider more than one possibility.

The facts are that there was an attack last Friday in Pakistan. Missiles destroy three homes. Eighteen people died in the attack. Four of the dead were removed from the scene.

It is believed (different from facts, educated guesses at best) that at least four of the people who died were members of the terror group al-Qaeda. It is believed that the US attacked the village.

It is possible that if Predator drones were sold or lost and recovered then a third party could use one in an attack and make it appear that the US was responsible (there is no proof that the US is being framed, if it was being framed then state department would probably deny the attack, which is hasn't).

If the US did attack the village in an attempt to assassinate suspected al-Qaeda terrorists and innocent people were killed in the attack does that make the US guilty of terrorist acts? Isn't terrorism the use of force with the intention to murder and cause fear?

How do you see it?

Monday, January 16, 2006

1/1000th of the story...

On the fifteenth of July in 1918 a massive explosion in southeastern Colorado burned a large area of land, just outside the town of Las Animas in Bent county. The pattern of destruction stretched in a circular shape in a three mile wide circumference. Witnesses reported a loud roar and saw a blinding flash in the sky. Trees and plains of high grass were pushed to the ground up to ten miles away from the explosion. At the center of the blast was a farmhouse that was the home the young Mills couple, Stephen and Joanne. Their home, the barn, and all of their land was incinerated in a single moment. The Mills died in the explosion along with an unnamed young woman and the woman's unborn child. The unidentified woman had come to stay with the Mills two weeks before the incident. It is believed she had been homeless and that she was looking for work and a safe haven where her child could be born. The cause of the explosion had been a mystery for most of the twentieth century. No evidence found at the scene offered a satisfactory explanation of what had caused the massive devastation. Local authorities would not support the rumors that the explosion was the result of the combustion of illegal blasting materials. No evidence of such materials had ever been discovered nor was it believed that the Mills would have had such materials on their property. Government investigators concluded that the explosion was the result of a meteor falling out of the sky, but no extraterrestrial materials had been discovered in the burned zone and none of the witness ever reported seeing anything streaking across the sky. Witnesses would only speak of a loud bang and a bright flash. Also there had been no impact crater that would show where a falling object would have crashed, which would support the government's explanation. However, decades later, in an issue of "Astrospace Journal", a feature article tells of a new hypothesis. Research from a team of students from Bent County Community College has become the definitive explanation of what caused the Mills/Las Animas explosion. It states that the event that flattened a forest, burned the land, destroyed the Mills farm and taken four lives was the result of the explosion of a low density asteroid, which broke apart when it came into the planet's atmosphere and sent its shockwave to the earth.

It is so bad that its really bad

When I posted about the hilarious "Ultimate Showdown" flash cartoon (http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/285267) I wrote that flash was a great way for talented people to create cartoons without having go through a third party and risk their craft being warped by someone else's desires. Anyone with computer know-how, artistic ability and a little bit of wit can release a cartoon short for absolutely anyone to download. Well I was wrong, you don't need the wit or the even the artistic ability for that matter. A parody of the Ultimate Showdown cartoon has been posted at newgrounds.com. "The Gayest Showdown" (http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/289517) by PowerRangerYELLOW, is proof that you don't have to be any good to be on the internet, which I believe isn't all that terrible of a thing.

Sunday, January 15, 2006

Batman Begins 2 rumors

Will the sequel be titled "Batman Begun", I wonder? While I have mixed feelings about Batman Begins, I consider it to be one of the better Batman movies. Here are some rumors about the new movie that I found at moviehole.net...


---

A few more Batman rumours to chew on

Posted by Clint Morris on January 12, 2006
Take it with a grain of salt for now, but have just had a bit of a chinwag with a scooper who seems to be as on the ball as you can get when you’re separated by a sea. In such occasions, we usually give them the floor…

‘Fly-on-the-wall’ says he’s got wind of a new name that the brothers Warner hope to have in the next “Batman” film. She’d play a femme fatale.

“This is the first screen appearance for this character in the Batman films and she has a very close connection with a major character in Nolan’s first Batman movie. She will be out for revenge against Bruce Wayne and Gotham in a major way. As of who the studio is looking at for this role, let’s just say that she is nominated for a SAG, a Golden Globe and is on her way to an Oscar nomination as well. She is also in fact five months pregnant and will be in tip top fighting shape once production begins to roll early next year but not before she throws a few coins in a fountain”.

We’re also told that every actor in town is interested in playing The Joker in the next film. Chris Nolan is pretty keen on getting ‘a name’ though.

“As you know, there are many actors who want the chance to do this character (The most requested Batman character next to Batman himself.) The studio is eyeing a major, major actor and Christopher Nolan himself is said to be just as excited as they are in nabbing him for the role. Who is he? Let’s just say that he has a major film coming out this summer and it’s a sequel to one of his biggest hits. In fact, his performance in the first movie was nominated for an Oscar. YES, they are looking at HIM if he is available for the role and rumor is that he might be interested depending on the script, which is being written right now”.

---

I don't have a clue about who either of these people could be.

Thursday, January 12, 2006

My "The Best Movies of 2005" List---Part 1

I am going to take a moment and reflect on the movies that entertained me in 2005. It was going to be a top ten list, but I barely saw more than ten movies last year. I decided to put the whole list up and just comment on each.

First up... "Elecktra" staring that girl from Alias (Jennifer Garner)

Was this supposed to be a sequel to Daredevil? I don't really remember anything about the plot of this movie, but Jennifer Garner is a hottie and she fights ninjas so I guess that was worth the price of the ticket. Wait?!?! It costs $8.75 to buy a movie ticket? Jen, you're not that hot. This was worse than Daredevil, which wasn't THAT great to begin with.

The second movie that I saw last year was... "SinCity" another comic book movie

Robert Rodriguez and Frank Miller brought the comic/noir world onto movies screens panel by panel. It was more entertaining than Elecktra, but that isn't saying much. This film was visually impressive, damn impressive, but the stories got too violent and too sensationalized. I have never read any of the Sin City the comics, but I have read some of Frank Miller's other series (Batman: Legends of the Dark Knight and The Dark Knight Returns). I wasn't impressed with these stories. Anti-heroes struggling against a corrupt system, "eh" I've seen that before.

Third... "Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith"

Being the dorkie guy that I am I was obligated to see this movie. I was never a huge fan of any of the Star Wars movies. They have been entertaining, but I have never seen anything in any of the Star Wars movies that you couldn't find by randomly turning on the Sci-fi Channel on any night of the week. However, the effects were good, the story did entertain and it was pleasing to see that whinny Anakin Skywalker get sliced into pieces.

Next, number four... George A. Romero's "Land of the Dead"

This was probably the best genre movie that I saw this year. I am a fan of all of Romero's horror films, because he spins his "dead" sub-genre to reflect the ugliness of our culture in the ugliness of his zombies. Night of the Living Dead, filmed at the end of the 1960's, has a group of innocent people being lynched by a mob of zombies in rural America. Dawn of the Dead portrays the mindlessness of mass consumerism. I admit I don't know what Day of the Dead is about, but from what I understand that movie was cut down a lot from the original vision. How I interpreted Land of the Dead is that American culture has given too much blind faith that the actions of our leaders are being done for the benefit of the masses when the reality is that many of our leaders are looking out only for their own selfish interests. In LotD the zombies seem to be a metaphor for terrorism, an entity that wants destruction and can now reach us on our city streets.

Monday, January 09, 2006

My First Conspiracy Theory

This post may the result of reading too many Nick Fury comic books or watching too many spy themed television shows and movies.

In September 2002, the Iranian government began construction of a nuclear energy facility. The Iranians state that their intentions are to develop nuclear technology to be used in power plants for energy. The United States fears that Iran could use the technology to develop atomic weapons. In November 2003, the International Atomic Energy Association is allowed to inspect Iran's facilities and finds no proof of a nuclear weapons program. The European Union and the United States, in a kind of good cop/bad cop way, attempt to negotiate an end to Iran's nuclear plans. In August of 2005 negotiations break down and Iran resumes work on one of its nuclear plants.

This past Sunday (01/08/06) Iran announced they will end the two year suspension of their nuclear research. Russia offered to allow Iran to continue its research at sights on Russian soil, but nothing has been agreed upon. The U.S. has warned that it may refer Iran to the U.N. for sanctions.

Also on Sunday, thirteen officers of Iran's military are killed when their jet crashes because of engine failure and bad weather. The commander of the Revolutionary Guard's ground forces, a veteran in Iran's conflicts with Iraq, and one of Iran's most powerful military men, Ahmed Kazemi, dies in the crash.

On the same day that Iran resumes its nuclear energy research one its highest ranking generals is killed in a plane crash. Doesn't that seem suspicious? It is possible that bad weather and engine failure did in fact bring the twenty-six year old jet crashing to the ground. However, isn't it also possible that a U.S./ E.U. operative sabotaged the plane in retaliation to Iran's defiance in pursuing a nuclear energy program? If the jet plane did crash through U.S. involvement then General Kazemi and his officers were murdered, which would be an act of terrorism. An illegal assassination meant to impart fear and serve as a threat to the government of Iran. Terrorism is a tactic that does get used in modern warfare. Although, to call it "strategic bombing" does make it sound less sinister.

So the U.S. may have had an Iranian general assassinated as a warning against continuing their nuclear program. Does that sound silly? Do I really believe that is what happened? If this is a conspiracy theory then why isn't there any mention of grey aliens or a grassy knoll? Has reading this been a waste of your time? There are always so many questions that are left unanswered with conspiracy theories.

Monday, January 02, 2006

Comic Books, Superheroes, and Me

About a year ago I made a rather bold declaration. I was going to give comic books one year to impress me or I would stop buying them completely. If you know me personally, you know that I am a comic fanboy. Although I have never used that term to describe myself before, I suppose that it is appropriate. A fanboy, as I understand it, is a guy who feels passionate about something that many people would consider to be nerdy, though I prefer the word "dorky." My passion is for comic books and superheroes. I have been reading comics for fifteen years. For more than half of my life I have been following Captain America, the X-Men, Peter Parker and Mary Jane, Darkhawk, the New Warriors, the Avengers, the Fantastic Four and so many more. I have invested a lot of myself into these characters, plots, writers and artists. So to me to declare that I am going to swear off comic books is a pretty serious statement. The deal was that comic books had to impress me at some point in the past year or I was going to walk away.

When I was ten years old my family would spend several weeks at our place in Tionesta, PA. It was a small cabin-like place with two bedrooms, a living room/kitchen area, a bathroom and a basement. We would go there for two whole weeks out of every summer. There was no cable or television reception available. It was either watched whatever television that was recorded before we came up on the VCR or interact with my family. Neither option seemed particularly enjoyable for any extended amount of time. However, at every general store, grocery store or book store in and around the Tionesta area a rack of comic books could be found. My first was a Marvel Summer special that had short stories from several characters (Iron Man, Speedball, and Tigra are the only characters that I can remember to have been in that issue). It only took one comic and Marvel had me hooked. It took DC killing off Superman before I would buy anything other than Marvel, which is one of the evils that I have come to realize about the industry; anything that will sell then is worth printing.

At first I could only afford one comic a week. My first year I bought Darkhawk, New Warriors, What-If..., and Amazing Spider-Man, but it was the Marvel trading cards that opened up my impressionable young mind to superheroes and their exploits. I studied every trivial fact from Jugernaught's height and weight to the "Did you know?" factoids that were at the bottom of the backside of every card. The following summer brought the Infinity Gauntlet series and its many crossovers. A mega-climatic battle against ultimate evil where every major hero joined together. It seemed like an awesome idea the first time I read it. The following summer the Infinity War sequeled with even more crossovers. Then the Infinity Crusade, which was the third summer Marvel milked the Infinity cow for a series, and I realized that series had peeked but it had made me curious about other comics. I was still loyal to the four comics that I started with . Darkhawk and the New Warriors were teenage characters, which made it easy for me as a pre-teen to relate to them. Amazing Spider-man had Mark Bagley as its artist, who is one of the best artist to ever draw the webhead. What-If offered a cataclysmic universe saving battle in almost every issue. However, I was curious about a lot of Marvel's other characters. My four comics were great, but they offered a very tiny glimpse of a universe that seemed amazing, incredible and fantastic.

Age of Apocalypse was the next super-crossover epic, like the Infinity series and DC's Zero Hour series, it was designed to be an exciting story that would get readers to buy a lot of comic books that they otherwise probably wouldn't spend their money on. I fell for it hard. I bought every X-Men comic for all of the AoA series and for the years that followed. To give an idea of what that means, there were nine different X-Men titles that Marvel printed month to month in the mid-90's and I read/bought every single one. Although, around that time Darkhawk and New Warriors were getting cancelled and dropped Spider-man at the beginning of the Clone Saga, which was a series that ruined Spidey for a lot of readers. In high school I was practically an X-Men only fanboy. Age Apocalypse barely had time to cool down when another Marvel epic was beginning, the Onslaught series. The tease claimed that "No one is safe." The hype said that there was a new villain that was going to rise and that he was going to drastically change the face of the Marvel universe and he delivered exactly that, but it only lasted for about a year. The wake of Onslaught split Marvel into two universes one where the Avengers and the Fantastic Four were given updated 90's style origins and another where the X-Men and Spider-man were Marvel's primary characters. Onslaught was a mess, another over-hyped crossover epic that had no lasting consequences because one year after it ended everything was reset and merged. The X-Men rebuilt their mansion, Peter Parker was web-swinging through New York City, the Avengers assembled, and the Fantastic Four were just as fantastic as they had been through their history.

The Thunderbolts were probably the only interesting group of characters that resulted from the series of epics that occurred through Marvel in the 90's. They were a team of villains that pretended to be a new group of heroes but discovered that they liked being good guys more than bad guys. The series was about struggling heroes trying to prove that they could do whatever it took to be decent in the eyes of the world. The Thunderbolts were a representation of anyone who is looked down because of who they are, but knows that they could be just as big a success as the powerful if they were only given the same opportunity. The late 90's brought a return to Marvel's classic universe. The number of X-Men and Spider-Man monthly titles were cut in half. Industry greats Kurt Busiek and George Perez teamed up for Avengers adventures. The Marvel Knights line began. It seemed as though Marvel was focusing on quality over quantity. At the same time I was trying to give DC comics a chance and read Superman, Batman and Green Lantern, but they never resonated with me like Marvel's characters did. DC's characters are more iconic and Marvel's are Shakespearean. Superman labors like Hercules and defends mere mortals from monsters and devils like Darkseid and Lex Luthor. While in the Marvel universe both Captain America and his one of his arch-villains Baron Zemo are haunted by ghosts from their pasts in a similar way that Hamlet is haunted by the ghost of his father. It is that Shakespearean twist that still makes Marvel's characters more appealing to me.

After high school I became of fan of Wildstorm's The Authority. They were superior's like the Justice League, a coming together of powerful men and women from different backgrounds, but The Authority seemed to have an edge that no other superior's did. Where the Justice League would throw down against brainwash or Doomsday without questioning it, they never took on real world problems. The Authority were superheroes that were much more violent than their Marvel or DC counter-parts, and they tackled issues like terrorism and had a pair of gay characters. The Authority seemed to be more relevant characters and told better stories, but in the end they were a disappointment in that the storytelling was too drawn out and offered little beyond its ultra-violence. Through college I became less and less interested in comics. The stories seemed completely self-important. The superheroes are constantly saving the world, but nothing ever changes for them. Thanos blinks half of the universe out of existence with the Infinity Gauntlet, but the heroes blink away all or the damage at the end of the story. Onslaught kills Earth's mightiest heroes, but a year later they were restored as if nothing happened. Peter Parker gets replaced by his clone and Mary Jane has a child, but it gets changed to appease the fans when sales dropped. Superman dies and lives again, Batman's broken spine heals itself, and Hal Jordan turns evil, then good, then dies, and is resurrected. What's the point of these stories? Why should I continue to spend my money (comics have more than double in price since when I started) on these plots and characters when after every climax nothing changes for the heroes?

I am not impressed with what Marvel and DC offered in the past year. The House of M series did not resolve anything that Dissassembled began the year before and DC is going through another Crisis with a revamp of its titles set for the near future. The industry is doing what it has always does and that is to appease the fans. I understand that comics are apart of an industry and that we live in a capitalistic society, but I don't have to like what that means for my favorite characters. I accept that Spidey, Wolverine, Captain America and Darkhawk will never rise to great literary levels in my lifetime, but I believe they come out of the same part of our psyche that the Odyssey, many Biblical stories, the Arthurian legends, and Shakespeare find validity through.

Today I read and have always read comics because the idea of a hero gives brings with it hope for a better future. In every corner of the world their exists suffering and the notion that changes can be made, evil can be opposed, good can win the day brings hope for a better future. I started reading comics because they seemed more exciting than my life and in a lot of ways they still seem to be more dramatic, but ultimately that excitement is less thrilling the things I want to get done with my life. The reason that comics have become less appealing to me is because their plots, no matter how dramatic, are lame compared to the things we can achieve with our lives and I don't think that is only true for comic books. Too many of us spend our time trapped in our routines, doing very little to better ourselves. Personally, I feel like I have been waiting forever for a signal that my time has come to begin the great things that I am going to do with my life. Well I am never going to get a signal. There comes a time when you have to decide whether what you want is what you already have or if there is more out there for you to take. If you are not happy then find out what is going to make you happy. Make sure that others are not tricking you into believing that you are pleased with yourself. Find out what it will take to make life whole and take it, its yours to have and you don't have to feel guilty about having it.

I am going to keep reading comics, because even though nothing about them impressed me last year, one or two things about them did entertain me. Comics will serve as a reminder of where I have been, but also that there are deeper seas to explore than the shallow pools that I have already known.